Amazon is going to battle with YouTube (time.com).
“On Monday, Amazon announced Amazon Video Direct, a new self-service program that will let video creators post videos on the company’s streaming platform and either sell them, rent them, make them available to Amazon Prime members or offer them for free with advertising. It’s the ad-supported videos that pose the biggest threat to YouTube. The Google-owned video site has come to dominate the world of online video by amassing a huge repository of videos and convincing marketers to sell ads against them.”
Indeed, which most with any sense watch without them with aid of any ad blocker which has not yet been bought out by mystery buyer.
But what happens without ads, as with the reminder on the time.com article if you have an ad blocker enabled? It will “break Time”. Indeed, or perhaps just encourage a look for something else aside from advertising which has been shown to be a game of diminishing returns and bandwidth-eating user annoyance if not worse from sites not efficiently keeping an eye on any suspect ads that may leave a lil’ package of not-so-malware-fun on drive-by-download or even just do a Rupe (Murdoch) and close door at a loss (remember MySpace?) or The Current Bun (The Sun)—went Paywall, broke Pick of the Week links, then changed its mind, went back to trying to tempt you with footie and bingo and ads. Actually though, I’m not that certain that the ads were or were not there whether you paid to get behind the wall or not.
Oh, wait, I though we were talking about video and not ads…. Yeah, the content really is secondary for some isn’t it, indeed being the “product” itself.
But for those that maintain ads are “harmless” this tasteful “body shaming” and get-rich-quick roundup—one click away from the MSN portals’ “promoted stories” might make you re… *shudder* at least.
I’m *hoping* that’s his ear she’s pullin’. Or, indeed, even these choice sponsored picks on the portals sliding stories front page itself:
For sure, the words “lowest, common,” and “denominator” spring to mind. Or how about these?
Indeed, “read this before browsing the internet” without our purchasable VPN which unfortunatey shares name with notorious “SaferWeb” malware (they are infact different “products” though just to make clear, but may scare the pants off you if you look up a review after rather than before purchase). And PPI claims; indeed, I was fortunate enough to be reimbursed less than a month ago but by a much “extreamly simpler” method known as checking my statement—God knows how I missed it so long though—and first thing bank in question said when initiating soon-successful claim over the phone was “go through us rather than any of the companies advertising who wish to take a large cut”.
Recent/related stories
- Dublin man scares the wits out of his mum in viral sponsored ad content (Latest Picks 9th May 2016)
- Pressure mounts at Google to find something beyond search; meanwhile roll out six-second ads that you can’t skip will have to do (Latest Picks 23rd April 2016)
- Proving the market stall propped up by body and performance shaming has gender equality by rubbin’ of the right ol’ premature 50 Shades of Cardigan nerve (Latest Picks 17th April 2016)
- Braless newsreader, new boobs or tight jacket? Or just viral portal sponsored ad content (Latest Picks 10th March 2016)
- Adblock got sold, and nobody knows who the mystery buyer is (Latest Picks 14th October 2015)